Lockheed Martin is the world’s largest defense contractor: the F-35, the PAC-3 and THAAD missile interceptors, Sikorsky helicopters and military satellites. Its backlog just hit a record $292 billion. The question this report asks is how much of that a new kind of competitor, led by Anduril, can take.
Today’s close against the report’s numbers, updated every weekday. The analysis is as of October 22, 2026; the rating as of October 22, 2026. Both change only when the report is revised.
The cash-flow model’s bear-to-bull range, the probability-weighted value, the price and its 52-week range. The copper line marks the base case; the fine dotted line is today’s close.
Written on October 22, 2026, the day of its third-quarter results. Figures are from the company’s filings and releases unless noted. Not investment advice. The author holds no LMT shares directly.
Lockheed reports four segments. Aeronautics (about 40% of sales) builds the F-35, the F-16 and the C-130. Missiles and Fire Control makes the PAC-3 and THAAD interceptors, GMLRS and PrSM rockets and long-range strike missiles. Rotary and Mission Systems is Sikorsky helicopters, radars and ship combat systems. Space builds satellites, the Orion capsule and the Trident submarine-launched missile.
About three-quarters of sales go to the U.S. government, and most of the rest to allies buying through it. Contracts run for years and are priced to give a steady single-digit to low-teens margin, which makes Lockheed a slow-growing, cash-generating business that pays out most of what it earns.
Third-quarter sales rose 11% to $20.7 billion. Missiles and Fire Control grew 24% as PAC-3, THAAD, GMLRS and PrSM production ramped, and Aeronautics 13%. Backlog jumped 27% in the quarter to $292 billion, including $52.5 billion for the PAC-3 MSE interceptor under a seven-year agreement worth up to $58.6 billion.
Lockheed raised its 2026 guidance for the second quarter running: sales of $80–82 billion, earnings of $30.35–30.75 a share and free cash flow of $7.8–8.0 billion. Management expects all four segments to grow in 2027, with a “clear line of sight” to high single-digit growth. The shares closed up about 7% on the day.
Anduril, valued at about $90 billion in an October employee share sale, is the most visible of a group of venture-backed defense companies that build products with their own money and sell them, rather than waiting for the Pentagon to fund development. Its 2026 revenue of about $4.3 billion is roughly 5% of Lockheed’s, but it is roughly doubling every year, and it has already won where it matters most: in June 2026 the Air Force chose Anduril and General Atomics to build the first collaborative combat aircraft (drone wingmen for fighters). Lockheed, Boeing and Northrop were not picked for that hardware, though all three are in the six-company pool competing to write the autonomy software.
| Market | Where Lockheed stands | How exposed |
|---|---|---|
| Drone wingmen (CCA) | Lost Increment 1 hardware to Anduril and General Atomics; in the software pool | High: this is where cheap, fast and autonomous beats exquisite |
| Low-cost missiles and counter-drone | Its long-range missiles are high-end; Anduril sells Barracuda cruise missiles and Roadrunner interceptors | Medium: a new low end of the market, not a replacement for the high end |
| Missile defense (PAC-3, THAAD) | Sole producer, with seven-year agreements and $8B committed to new capacity | Low for now: years of qualification and production behind it |
| F-35 and space | The only fifth-generation fighter in production for the U.S. and allies; 850 more U.S. jets planned | Low: no new entrant can build a crewed fighter or Trident this decade |
The threat is real but narrow so far. Anduril’s wins come mostly in new categories the Pentagon is now funding (the 2027 request includes nearly $75 billion for unmanned and counter-drone systems), not in the programs that make up most of Lockheed’s backlog. The bigger long-term risk is budget mix: if more money goes to large numbers of cheap autonomous systems and less to high-end platforms, the primes’ share of new spending shrinks even as their old programs keep running.
| FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM Sep 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $67.0B | $66.0B | $67.6B | $71.0B | $75.0B | $79.1B |
| Operating margin | 13.6% | 12.7% | 12.6% | 9.9% | 10.3% | 11.8% |
| Net income | $6.3B | $5.7B | $6.9B | $5.3B | $5.0B | $6.5B |
| Operating cash flow | $9.2B | $7.8B | $7.9B | $7.0B | $8.6B | $10.1B |
| Capital spending | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Free cash flow | $7.7B | $6.1B | $6.2B | $5.3B | $6.9B | $8.4B |
Sales have grown about 3% a year since 2021, while operating income fell in 2024 and only partly recovered in 2025 because of losses on classified Aeronautics and Missiles programs and charges on fixed-price contracts. 2026 is the first year of a clear recovery: guidance implies about 8% sales growth and an operating margin back near 12%. The quarterly view shows each quarter.
At the end of September Lockheed had $6.0 billion of cash and $20.5 billion of long-term debt, about $14.5 billion of net debt. It bought back no shares in the first nine months of 2026 (against $2.25 billion a year earlier) while it funds the munitions expansion and the pending purchase of Ultra Maritime, but it raised its dividend for the 24th year in a row. It expects to contribute more than $1 billion to its pension plan next year.
One item to watch: Lockheed’s costs on the F-35 Lot 20 contract have run ahead of the funding authorized so far, and the company warns that results will suffer if negotiations on Lots 20 and later do not close. Lot 20 is now expected in 2027.
| Assumption | Base case | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Sales, 2026 | $81B | Guidance midpoint |
| Growth, 2027 and 2028 | 7%, then 6% | Management’s high single-digit outlook; fades to 3% by year 10 |
| Operating margin | 11.5% rising to 12% | Segment margin plus the pension adjustment; F-35 production is accretive |
| Reinvestment | $1 for every $4 of new sales | Munitions capacity and working capital |
| Discount rate | 8.1% | Beta 0.80 for defense peers (Lockheed’s own is 0.48), 13% debt |
| Terminal growth | 3.0% | With a 15% return on new capital |
| Bear | Base | Bull | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth, 2027 / 2028 | 4% / 3% | 7% / 6% | 9% / 8% |
| Long-run operating margin | 10.5% | 12% | 13% |
| Discount rate | 9.1% | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| Value per share | $401 | $647 | $973 |
| Probability | 25% | 50% | 25% |
Weighted 25/50/25: $667. The bear case is a budget squeeze after the midterms plus share lost to cheaper autonomous systems; the bull case is the munitions ramp and F-35 multi-year deal running ahead of plan.
| Discount rate | 7.0% | 7.5% | 8.0% | 8.5% | 9.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value per share | $840 | $742 | $664 | $600 | $547 |
Every figure in this valuation comes from one model script, rerun and checked against this page each time the site is built. The XLSX model rebuilds it in live formulas: change any blue input and every year’s cash flow, the bridge to the value, the scenarios and the sensitivity table recalculate.
| To justify the price, you need | Against |
|---|---|
| Sales growth of about 4% a year for two years, then the same fade | 7% and 6% |
| Or a long-run operating margin of about 11% | 12% |
| Or a discount rate of about 8.6% | 8.1% |
The price asks for less growth than management is guiding to, which is why the model sits above it. Before the results the shares were down 21% from their high as investors began to price in a Democratic Congress after the November 3 midterms, which could trim the proposed defense increase.
| Risk | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Budgets and politics | A Democratic Congress could cut the proposed $500 billion increase or force long continuing resolutions. |
| New entrants | Anduril and others are winning the fast-growing autonomous categories; the CCA loss shows it. |
| Fixed-price programs | Charges on classified programs cut operating income in 2024 and 2025. |
| F-35 funding | Lot 20 costs are already running ahead of authorized funding. |
| Pension and buybacks | More than $1 billion of pension contributions next year and no buybacks this year. |
Upside: missile defense demand that management calls “permanent”, a 10-year F-35 production path, Golden Dome missile-defense spending, and a return to buybacks once the munitions build-out is funded.
Lockheed is the sole supplier of the interceptors and munitions now in most demand, under seven-year contracts. Anduril is taking the new drone and low-cost categories, which caps Lockheed’s share of future budgets, but it does not touch the F-35, PAC-3, THAAD or Trident this decade.
What would change the value: The budget after the November 3 midterms, F-35 Lot 20 funding and the 2027 guidance in January are the next inputs.
Ranges, not three cases. The expected value is the average of 4,000 runs of this report’s own model, with every input drawn from a range: the base case is the middle, and the bear and bull cases are the 10th and 90th percentiles. Business inputs move together; the discount rate moves on its own. The 25/50/25 weighting in the valuation section gives $667. How the ranges work
Two different questions. The rating is relative: it asks whether the stock is cheaper or dearer than the S&P 500 on the same assumptions. The absolute view asks whether it is worth its price at all: on its own the stock trades 10% below our estimated value.
On the same assumptions every report uses (a 5.15% Treasury yield and a 4.5% equity premium), the S&P 500 itself is worth about 68% of its price. The rating compares each stock with that: Buy if it is at least 15% cheaper than the market on this basis, Sell if at least 15% dearer, Hold in between. It is the same rule for every company, whoever owns it. The rating is the same whether the index is assumed to grow 6% or 10% a year. How ratings work
| Measure | Lockheed Martin | Industry median | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth, last fiscal year | 5.6% | 10.1% | 11 of 12 | Worse than the median |
| Operating margin | 11.8% | 10.3% | 4 of 12 | Better than the median |
| Price to earnings | 22.8× | 27.7× | 5 of 12 | Better than the median |
| Free cash flow yield | 5.6% | 3.0% | 2 of 12 | Better than the median |
Peers: the 11 other S&P 500 companies in Aerospace & Defense with complete data (AXON, BA, GD, GE, HII, HWM, LHX, NOC, RTX, TDG, TXT). Last twelve months where reported, from SEC filings; prices from the latest close. A lower price-to-earnings ratio ranks higher. These figures update with each data run; the rating does not.
Anduril wins the new categories; Lockheed still owns the ones with years of backlog.
| What | Figures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Latest results | $20.7B (Sales, Q3 2026, +11%), $7.97 (Earnings per share), $3.0B (Free cash flow), $292B (Backlog, a record) and others | Q3 2026 results; Earnings call; Share price reaction |
| The numbers (five-year table) | Five years of annual figures and the last twelve months | SEC XBRL company facts; latest: 10-K for the period to 2025-12-31, 10-Q for the period to 2026-09-27 |
| Price at writing | $590.20 (Close, Oct 22, 2026) | Yahoo Finance; the time of the quote is stated beside the price |
| Discount rate inputs | 10-year Treasury 5.15%, equity risk premium 4.5% | Fixed for every report so they can be compared; How ratings work |
| Valuation | Every value, case and sensitivity | This site’s model: XLSX, CSV |
| Checked by hand | 11 figures on October 23, 2026 | All match. Audit log |
| Input | Bear (10th percentile) | Base (median) | Bull (90th percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth, first forecast year | 4.0% | 7.0% | 9.0% |
| Growth, second forecast year | 3.0% | 6.0% | 8.0% |
| Operating margin, near term | 10.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% |
| Operating margin, long run | 10.5% | 12.0% | 13.0% |
| Discount rate | 9.1% | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| Simulation result | |
|---|---|
| Expected value (average of 4,000 runs) | $650.45 |
| Likely range, 10th to 90th percentile | $467.97 to $845.66 |
| Median | $635.32 |
| Chance the value is above the price | 63% |
| Chance it is cheaper than the S&P 500 | 97% |
Each input is drawn from a split normal: its bear and bull values are the 10th and 90th percentiles, so the two sides can differ. Business inputs share a common factor (correlation 0.6); the discount rate moves on its own. Inputs not listed are held at their base value. How the simulation works.