Anduril builds autonomous drones, missiles and the software that links them, and sells them to the U.S. military and its allies. Revenue is roughly doubling every year and it is valued at about $90 billion, priced more like a software company than a defense contractor. An IPO is expected around 2027.
Company values in billions: the scenario model’s range, the probability-weighted value, the May round and the October employee tender. The copper line marks the base case.
Written on October 21, 2026. Figures are from company statements and news reports, as linked; they are not audited. Not investment advice. This company is private, so there is no share price; values are for the whole company. The author holds no shares.
Anduril was founded in 2017 by Palmer Luckey, Trae Stephens, Brian Schimpf (now CEO) and others. It designs and builds its own products and sells them, rather than waiting for the Pentagon to fund development. Its range includes the Fury collaborative combat aircraft, Roadrunner reusable interceptors, Barracuda low-cost cruise missiles, Ghost Shark underwater drones and surveillance towers, all linked by Lattice, its AI command software.
Production is moving to Arsenal-1, a plant of nearly $1 billion in Ohio designed to build up to 150 Fury aircraft a year.
Revenue has roughly doubled every year. In March 2026 the U.S. Army signed an enterprise agreement worth up to $20 billion over ten years that consolidates more than 120 contracts. Anduril is still loss-making: it guided to an operating loss of about $1.2 billion in 2026 as it builds factories.
| 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 guidance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0.24B | $0.42B | $1.0B | $2.2B | ~$4.3B |
Anduril does not publish full financial statements. The reported 2026 operating loss of about $1.2 billion reflects heavy spending on Arsenal-1 and new products; management has pointed to operating breakeven later in the decade.
Anduril was valued at $14 billion in August 2024, $30.5 billion in June 2025 and $61 billion in May 2026, when it raised $5 billion led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz. An employee share sale that opened on October 13 values it at $90 billion ($94.80 a share). Talks about a round near $100 billion were reported in July but not confirmed. No S-1 has been filed.
Valued on 2030 earning power and discounted at 13% a year. The bull case gives it Palantir-like margins and a 35× multiple.
| Bear | Base | Bull | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue in 2030 | $8B | $14B | $22B |
| Operating margin | 5% | 12% | 18% |
| Exit multiple | 20× | 25× | 35× |
| Company value today | $4B | $20B | $67B |
| Probability | 25% | 50% | 25% |
Weighted 25/50/25: about $28 billion, well below where private investors value it.
The values above are for the whole company in 2030. A private company that is still burning cash pays for it by selling new shares, and the money those buyers put in is theirs, not today’s owners’. So the value of a stake bought today is the whole-company value less the present value of the capital still to be raised. The table shows that for several amounts raised evenly over the next four years, discounted at the model’s 13%. “Share sold” is how much of the company those raises would buy at the last valuation of $90B; at a lower price, the share sold would be larger.
| Capital raised before 2030 | Share sold at the last valuation | Value to today’s owners (base case) | Against the last valuation |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 0% | $20B | −78% |
| $2.5B | 3% | $18B | −80% |
| $5.0B | 5% | $16B | −82% |
| $10B | 10% | $12B | −87% |
Every figure in this valuation comes from one model script, rerun and checked against this page each time the site is built. The XLSX model rebuilds it in live formulas: change any blue input and every year’s cash flow, the bridge to the value, the scenarios and the sensitivity table recalculate.
| To justify the price, you need | Against |
|---|---|
| At defense-contractor margins (12%): about $62B of revenue in 2030 | $4.3B guided for 2026 |
| At software-like margins (25%) and a 35× multiple: about $21B | The bull case |
Private investors are paying for growth well beyond 2030, and for the chance that Anduril becomes a new prime contractor with software margins. Traditional defense primes such as L3Harris trade at a fraction of that multiple.
| Risk | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Valuation | At about 21× 2026 revenue it is priced far above any defense company. |
| Budgets | Almost all revenue depends on U.S. and allied defense spending. |
| Execution | Arsenal-1 and Fury production must ramp on time. |
| Competition | Lockheed, RTX, General Atomics, Shield AI and Saronic all chase the same programs. |
Upside: the Army agreement, collaborative combat aircraft orders and exports could keep revenue doubling.
Anduril is growing like a top software company, but the scenarios value it far below the $61–90 billion private marks. An IPO that starts from those marks would price in close to the bull case.
What would change the value: Fury production, the Army enterprise agreement and an S-1 with audited margins would show whether the private marks are justified.
Private companies are not rated: there is no price at which to buy them. The values above are for the whole company, before the dilution that future funding rounds would bring. How ratings work
The business is excellent; the valuation already assumes it stays that way for a decade.
| What | Figures | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate inputs | 10-year Treasury 5.15%, equity risk premium 4.5% | Fixed for every report so they can be compared; How ratings work |
| Valuation | Every value, case and sensitivity | This site’s model: XLSX, CSV |
| Checked by hand | Not yet | Reports are added to the audit log as they are revised |
| Input | Bear (10th percentile) | Base (median) | Bull (90th percentile) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue, target year | $8B | $14B | $22B |
| Margin, target year | 5.0% | 12.0% | 18.0% |
| Exit multiple | 20× | 25× | 35× |
| Simulation result | |
|---|---|
| Expected value (average of 4,000 runs) | $27B |
| Likely range, 10th to 90th percentile | $5B to $57B |
| Median | $21B |
Each input is drawn from a split normal: its bear and bull values are the 10th and 90th percentiles, so the two sides can differ. Business inputs share a common factor (correlation 0.6); the discount rate is the same in every case, so it is not drawn. Inputs not listed are held at their base value. How the simulation works.